Fong Vang wrote: > > Any idea what else to check for? Could it be that the e1000 driver in > CentOS 4.3 x64 is older than the CentOS 4.1 driver? dont know about the rest of your issues, but the e1000 driver has definitely been updated since 4.1 days... - KB -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kickstart, no dhcp reply received.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [CentOS] kickstart, no dhcp reply received.
- From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 23:58:59 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4f52331f0605241544x378bead2x1e4a6d2d70359892@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <4f52331f0605241544x378bead2x1e4a6d2d70359892@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060313)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [CentOS] kickstart, no dhcp reply received.
- From: Fong Vang
- Re: [CentOS] kickstart, no dhcp reply received.
- References:
- [CentOS] kickstart, no dhcp reply received.
- From: Fong Vang
- [CentOS] kickstart, no dhcp reply received.
- Prev by Date: [CentOS] Centos4 and Sun V40z x86_64
- Next by Date: Re: [CentOS] Centos4 and Sun V40z x86_64
- Previous by thread: [CentOS] kickstart, no dhcp reply received.
- Next by thread: Re: [CentOS] kickstart, no dhcp reply received.
- Index(es):
 |