On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 18:07 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Fri, 12 May 2006, Charles Lacroix wrote:
>
> >
> > Woops, i would sugest changing your password ie, the one printed into the
> > bounce message :)
> >
> > I hope you are not using this for anything else than mailling lists :)
>
> Thanks :) Actually it was a generated password (which mailman does if you
> don't specify one). If I use passwords, I have them randomly generated by
> Revelation with a size of 16. Consequently, I don't know any of those
> passwords by heart. And thanks to Revelation, I don't have to.
Is it just me or ...
Putting a password, regardless of source, into a "probe", which by its
very existence seems to have a higher likelihood of interception, seems
foolish. If there is a problem along the intermediate steps (if any) and
somebody is examining stuff, for righteous or nefarious reasons, ...
>
> Thanks again for the email.
>
> Kind regards,
> -- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
> [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
> <snip sig stuff>
--
Bill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060512/dfb3ff02/attachment.bin
