On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 10:02 -1000, Camron W. Fox wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> > > > > You have to put: > > > > protect=0 > > > > in all the non-protected repos as well > > > > D'OH...1D10T. Sooo, if I want to protect my Base repository from > updates from Dag, and I want to protect the Dag repository from updates > from KBS, for example, I'm just have to run yum with enable/disable > repos accordingly? I haven't reviewed the docs recently, but IIRC all repos with protect=1 are protected from all with protect=0. They are not protected from each other and ones with protect=0 are not protected from anybody. So my take is the "base protected" is intended to protect base pkgs from corruption/destruction by "add ons". All other protection comes from "enablerepo=" on the command line combined with "disable=" in the repo definitions... and the loose nut behind the wheel, of course. Don't trust *my* memory though (bothers me not one whit if you are screwed! ;-): review the docs and get it right~ > > Best Regards, > Camron > > <snip sigs> HTH -- Bill -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060506/436cf479/attachment.bin