On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 15:59 -0400, Max H. wrote:
> Damian Sobieralski wrote:
> > Questions:
> >
> > 1) Is dag a good repository to get me these apps that aren't part of the
> > stock CentOS repository file? If not, which one should I use? I don't
> > need bleeding edge (even two versions behind for an app would be fine).
> >
> > 2) What's up with the gpg failures? Should I be worried?
>
> To answer the first question, Dag is a wonderful Repo for locating just
> about anything extra that you could find.
>
> The second question I would have to guess is that the key isn't
> installed for the packages when you're trying to authenticate against
> the signatures.
>
> Try to import the key and re-run yum against Dag's repo.
>
> rpm --import http://dag.wieers.com/packages/RPM-GPG-KEY.dag.txt
>
> Then "yum --enablerepo=dag {install,search,update,etc.} packagename
>
> Max
> <snip sig stuff>
And also keep in mind that Dag is asking folks to use rpmforge where
possible. In the archives are instructions to install the rpmforge
package.
--
Bill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060504/c2cc4b05/attachment.bin
