Re: Rebuilding Raid 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Yes they do I just left that out.

It is almost done resyncing. 

I have a replacement drive that I want to sync after this is finished to 
remove the drive that had the problem to begin with.  In this case sda

I would assume that I would create the raid partitions on the new drive 
and then sync again something similar to what I have just done.

Thanks so much for your help

This server has been running for 2months with no problems and this is 
sure a learning experience for me.


Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 00:21, Mace Eliason wrote:
>   
>> Also I ran fdisk -l and this is what I got
>>
>> /dev/sda1
>> /dev/sda2
>> /dev/sda3
>>
>> /dev/sdb1
>> /dev/sdb2
>> /dev/sdb3
>>
>> disk /dev/md0: 106meg
>> /dev/md0 doesn't contain a valid partion table
>>
>> disk /dev/md2: 15.9gig
>> /dev/md2 doesn't contain a valid partion table
>>
>> disk /dev/md1: 2097meg
>> /dev/md1 doesn't contain a valid partion table
>>
>> Does that help at all?
>>     
>
> I expected it to show the sizes of the sda/sdb partitions
> but that was just a sanity check to make sure that the
> corresponding partitions match.  It's a fairly safe
> assumption that they do.
>
>   

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux