OT: New article: Let's block cracker using denyhosts

[fajarpri at cbn.net.id (Fajar Priyanto)]

On Friday 31 March 2006 12:12 am, Craig White wrote:
> the thread on the fedora-list has pointed out that the denyhosts rpm
> packaging by rpmforge is deficient when compared to the packaging done
> in fedora extras which correlates to all the extra steps necessary in
> your write up.
>
> you might want to...
>
> 1 - provide a suggestion to rpmforge of the post-install scripts used in
> the spec file of the fedora-extras packaging so rpmforge does the same
>
> 2 - provide a suggestion to rpmforge that they remove the fedora-core 4
> & 5 packages since fedora-extras is packaging them already and there is
> a conflict

I'm sure Dag is monitoring this list. By the way, is it ok to use FC package 
in Centos? How far is the compatibility? Or is it that we shouldn't use it at 
all for the sake of security and stability?
-- 
Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | Linux tutorial 
http://linux2.arinet.org
05:10:56 up 19:47, 2.6.15-1.1830_FC4 GNU/Linux 
Let's use OpenOffice. http://www.openoffice.org