On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 14:06 -0700, Craig White wrote: > On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 15:59 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 21:17 +0100, Peter Farrow wrote: > > > William L. Maltby wrote: > > while I agree...it's not up to you, I, Peter or whomever to be list > moms...that's for the list managers if they so choose. It comes off as > rather sanctimonious. Sorry 'bout that! Is that to say that I should not have posted a suggestion I thought useful and/or appropriate? Are you now being my "mom"? I suspect that is not your intent. I don't believe I posted anything that implied that I could/would police the activities of others. I posted a ref that I hoped would help folks get some sense of some things that helped them and others when help was needed. If that is somehow "out of bounds" or seen as discourteous, I guess I'm more ignorant than I believed I was. > <snip> Bill -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060329/864ddffd/attachment.bin