> when when email users aren't system users, even > dovecot would have to be managed differently. Which is why postfix with db support is included in centosplus. -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety'' Benjamin Franklin 1775
Re: dovecot vs Cyrus-Imapd
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: dovecot vs Cyrus-Imapd
- From: jperrin at gmail.com (Jim Perrin)
- Date: Sat Mar 25 00:21:50 2006
- In-reply-to: <1143245957.10206.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <1143242043.8643.10.camel@basesystem> <1143243419.30557.83.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4424839B.9050902@xxxxxxxx> <1143245957.10206.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: dovecot vs Cyrus-Imapd
- From: Peter Farrow
- Re: dovecot vs Cyrus-Imapd
- References:
- dovecot vs Cyrus-Imapd
- From: Bob Pierce
- dovecot vs Cyrus-Imapd
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: dovecot vs Cyrus-Imapd
- From: Keith Morse
- Re: dovecot vs Cyrus-Imapd
- From: Les Mikesell
- dovecot vs Cyrus-Imapd
- Prev by Date: Re: dovecot vs Cyrus-Imapd
- Next by Date: Another server hosed
- Previous by thread: Re: dovecot vs Cyrus-Imapd
- Next by thread: Re: dovecot vs Cyrus-Imapd
- Index(es):
 |