Maciej ?enczykowski wrote: > It's not a matter of voting... it's a matter of paying for the ftp server > bandwidth. Using bittorrent you pay for the transfer by uploading a bit > yourself, not to mention that many volunteers (like me) leave their > bittorrents clients up and running long after they're done downloading > (I've already uploaded about 35 DVD's worth). What's the difference between 4 CDs and 1 DVD split into 4 chunks? Nothing. If you want to make a case for distributing costs, then yank the CDs and make them only available as torrents as well. Jack
Non-torrent D/L of 4.3 DVD image?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Non-torrent D/L of 4.3 DVD image?
- From: jack at internetguy.net (Jack Bailey)
- Date: Wed Mar 22 22:11:09 2006
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603222303440.28507@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <200603221639.46794.swsnyder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4421C906.4080409@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603222303440.28507@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Non-torrent D/L of 4.3 DVD image?
- From: Johnny Hughes
- Non-torrent D/L of 4.3 DVD image?
- References:
- Non-torrent D/L of 4.3 DVD image?
- From: Steve Snyder
- Non-torrent D/L of 4.3 DVD image?
- From: Jack Bailey
- Non-torrent D/L of 4.3 DVD image?
- From: Maciej Żenczykowski
- Non-torrent D/L of 4.3 DVD image?
- Prev by Date: Mirror Mirror on the wall, who is the slowest of them all? CentOS
- Next by Date: yum update problem
- Previous by thread: Non-torrent D/L of 4.3 DVD image?
- Next by thread: Non-torrent D/L of 4.3 DVD image?
- Index(es):
 |