Hi,
Thank you for your help. I had rebuild the HylaFAX as you had suggested without
any problem and running fine so far.
--- Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am Mi, den 15.03.2006 schrieb Chin um 2:23:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Am I right to say that I have to install hylafax-4.2.5-1fc3.x86_64.rpm
> rather
> > than hylafax-4.2.5-1rhel4.i386.rpm because the rpm command failed if tried
> to
> > install the RHEL version. I am running an updated CentOS 4.2 x86_64.
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Chin
>
> Generally you can run i386 software on x86_64 arch of CentOS. If you opt
> for the x86_64 only alternate, then I wouldn't choose the FC3 RPM of
> HylaFax as FC3 isn't identical with RHEL4, just a base for it's
> development. I would take the SRC.RPM
>
> ftp://ftp.hylafax.org/binary/linux/redhat/SRPMS/hylafax-4.2.5-1rhel4.src.rpm
>
> and "rpmbuild --rebuild --target x86_64 hylafax-4.2.5-1rhel4.src.rpm"
> it.
>
> Alexander
>
>
> --
> Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
> legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
> Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp
> Serendipity 22:00:58 up 4 days, 23:48, load average: 0.50, 0.48, 0.43
> > _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - Search movie info and celeb profiles and photos.
http://sg.movies.yahoo.com/
