Hi all,
Am I right to say that I have to install hylafax-4.2.5-1fc3.x86_64.rpm rather
than hylafax-4.2.5-1rhel4.i386.rpm because the rpm command failed if tried to
install the RHEL version. I am running an updated CentOS 4.2 x86_64.
Thank you.
Regards,
Chin
--- Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am Di, den 14.03.2006 schrieb Adriano Frare um 19:43:
>
> > Then, Install version hylafax-4.2.3-1rhel4
> >
> > It's work.
> >
> > Adriano
>
> HylaFax 4.2.5 fixes 2 security issues older versions have:
>
> Security fix - hfaxd vulnerability CVE-2005-3538
> Security fix - script vulnerability CVE-2005-3539
>
> Alexander
>
>
> --
> Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
> legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
> Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp
> Serendipity 02:08:19 up 1 day, 3:56, load average: 0.34, 0.26, 0.15
> > _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - Search movie info and celeb profiles and photos.
http://sg.movies.yahoo.com/
