Karanbir CentOS REPO - Breakability?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 17:23 -0800, Jim Smith wrote:
> --- Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > ermmm ... it is a REBUILD of fedora extras ... what do you expect?
> > Gentoo packges?
> > 
>  
> No I did not expect Gentoo packages, I expected Debian sid packages.
> 
> On a serious note if i wanted broken packages, all i had to do was to
> :-
> 
> - install fedora rawhide
> - enable ATRPMS
> 
> What's the purpose of blindly following ALL fedora rebuilds? What
> will happen when the FC5 rebuilds are churned out? Even more broken-ness?
-----
For the record, I think ATRPMS is a tremendous resource and your attempt
a humor didn't need to take a back handed slap at someone who gives a
tremendous amount of time and energy to providing a repository for
bleeding edge sounds and graphics applications. Without ATRPMS, it would
be incredibly difficult to built a mythtv system on Fedora or CentOS.

Craig


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux