Craig White wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 13:15 -0500, Chris Mauritz wrote:
>
>> Craig White wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 09:19 -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Think of Fedora as a giant public beta test, and the Enterprise versions as
>>>> the result.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ----
>>> that's a bit simplistic. In some cases, that is true, in many cases, it
>>> is not true. Fedora is a much richer Desktop experience which may be
>>> what is desired.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> If you'll read the original post, you'll notice his query was for
>> "server" usage.
>>
> ----
> If I'll read the original post? Do you mean this one?
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2006-January/018774.html
>
> Where he says that it's a server for X desktops?
>
> The reason I am responding is that I didn't much appreciate the
> inference that I wasn't completely aware of the original post and wonder
> why you felt it necessary to make that inference.
>
> If you want to attack my opinion, by all means have at it.
>
> If you want to suggest that I didn't follow the thread, you are clearly
> wrong. I shouldn't have to defend myself from this type of insinuation.
>
What on earth did I do to deserve that missive? I simply thought you
missed the original post. You're reading criticism into my post that
simply wasn't there. Jeez.
<Steve Martin>
Excuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuse me!
</Steve Martin>
8-)
Cheers,
