On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 02:18 -0600, Steve Bergman wrote:
> I'm trying to come to a decision between CentOS 4.2 and Fedora Core 4
> for use on a server. One of the things the server will be serving is X
> desktops so there are some advantages to Fedora.
>
> However, one thing I can't help but notice is that the patch volume for
> FC4 from Oct 11 2005 thru the present compared to CentOS 4.2 for the
> same period is about 5 times greater. In fact, since June, there are
> 899 RPMs in the FC4 updates directory for FC4 which seems absolutely insane.
>
> CentOS is a smaller distro, but not that much smaller. Also, I
> understand that CentOS's parent distro (from a prominent North American
> Linux Distributor) is supposed to be better tested before release than
> Fedora. But still, there must be some other factor to explain the
> disparity. Like CentOS only releasing a patch for security problems and
> not bug fixes or something like that.
>
> Could someone enlighten me?
RHEL only gets security updates between update releases. Since RHEL
update releases correspond to CentOS minor versions,
non-security-related updates usually only occur once every 3 months and
in one fell swoop, not piece-by-piece as in Fedora.
--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://centos.ivazquez.net/
gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060127/da8d4b51/attachment.bin
