I've installed the development packages mentioned below - and they went in
just fine. They fixed the bug that I'd run into, and are working just fine on
a pretty busy dual proc opteron database server.
Dunno what standard you want to hold packages to before development packages
are considered "release ready" - but it looks pretty good to me so far.
Pakcages installed, both on X86/64 and X86/32:
[root@kepler ~]# rpm -qa | grep postgre
postgresql-server-8.1.2-1.c4
postgresql-test-8.1.2-1.c4
compat-postgresql-libs-3_x86_64-4.c4.centos
postgresql-8.1.2-1.c4
postgresql-contrib-8.1.2-1.c4
postgresql-docs-8.1.2-1.c4
postgresql-libs-8.1.2-1.c4
postgresql-devel-8.1.2-1.c4
-Ben
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 13:57, Jim Perrin wrote:
> > I got the debuginfo package, installed, and found that the problem comes
down
> > to a bug fixed in PG 8.1.1, and the current release seems to be 8.1.2 -
any
> > chance this can be updated?
>
> These aren't RHEL production packages that are rebuilt. These packages
> are from fedora and are still on our development list. Please keep
> this in mind when using them. I'm running them through the build
> system now, so they should be up in a couple hours.
>
>
> > This is a production server, so I REALLY don't want to leave the CentOS
build
> > environment...
>
> These are still in our DEVELOPMENT repository because they haven't had
> enough feedback to make it to centosplus yet. Please keep this in mind
> and test them appropriately in your environment before rolling them
> into production.
>
>
> --
> Jim Perrin
> System Architect - UIT
> Ft Gordon & US Army Signal Center
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
--
"The best way to predict the future is to invent it."
- XEROX PARC slogan, circa 1978
