> -----Original Message-----
> From: centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff Lasman
> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 9:51 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: Self-signed certificates
>
> On Monday 23 January 2006 05:44 pm, Thomas E Dukes wrote:
>
> > I'm not trying to be cheap but this is a crock! 128 bit is 128 bit!
> > Browsers should be able to recognize the encryption method, not the
> > name. I mean, that's what its all about.
>
> Hmmmm... You've lost me again <frown>.
>
> If you mean cert distributors, you can buy certs for about
> $10 from GoDaddy, and yes, browsers recognize them.
Is that with their hosting package or can you buy it outright? And browsers
will accept them without a "security alert"?
>
> If you mean the browser should recognize the cert as a cert
> and not care about the name it's issued for, that can't work
> because the purpose of a cert is to guarantee you're talking
> to whom you think you're talking to. So the domain name has
> to be in there.
The name I was referring to was the issuing authority not the domain name
for which it was issued to.
>
> Jeff
> --
> Jeff Lasman, Nobaloney Internet Services
> 1254 So Waterman Ave., Suite 50, San Bernardino, CA 92408
> Our blists address used on lists is for list email only Phone
> +1 909 266-9209, or see: "http://www.nobaloney.net/contactus.html";
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
