On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 18:16 -0500, Jim Perrin wrote:
> > Hmmm. I'll give that a try. Not really interested in the error about being
> > 'self-signed' (issuing authority) but just want the name to be right and the
> > security to be there.
> >
> > Will try and let you know.
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/name-based.html
>
> Note the line near the top that says "Name-based virtual hosting
> cannot be used with SSL secure servers because of the nature of the
> SSL protocol." And also
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/ssl/ssl_faq.html#vhosts
>
> The first just says you can't. the second provides a more detailed
> reason. The way I gave you is really the only way to accomplish what
> you're doing with mod_ssl etc.
>
I spent much time around trying to figure out a way to do this ... only
way I found ... do it by IP ... each SSL cert needs to be on a different
IP
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060123/907b0235/attachment.bin
