Re: kde-3.5.0(kmail) is slow(er)

[rdieter at math.unl.edu (Rex Dieter)]

Lamar Owen wrote:

>> > KDE 3.5 is slower, unfortunately, so you don't want to do this on an
>> > old machine; the machine needs to be recent and needs to have more than
>> > 256MB
...
>> Provided ample RAM, I've personally found kde 3.5 to be subjectively
>> faster (partly due to pkg optimization tweaking).
> 
> Kmail for one definitely feels slower, and the startup time IS longer. 
...
> it felt slower.  Started Kontact/kmail, and it too felt slower, although

OK, I'll give you that kmail is slower.  However, I still have to say that
KDE(3.5), in general, is (should be) faster.

-- Rex