Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 22:09, Paul wrote:
>> I also found Debian Stable a bit too long in the tooth as far as
>> software packages ... it felt like I was migrating from RHL 7.3 to 6.2.
>
> Yes, if you are arguing about future availability of Centos, ask
> the Debian proponent to describe the schedule for planned
> future Debian releases. I've never been able to understand
> that myself.
And for EOL on security fixes for older versions. I have to admit that
I have no idea how long they support these, so their support actually
could be quite okay.
Ralph
--
Ralph Angenendt......ra@xxxxxxxxxxxx | .."Text processing has made it possible
Bayerischer Rundfunk...80300 M?nchen | ....to right-justify any idea, even one
Programmbereich.Bayern 3, Jugend und | .which cannot be justified on any other
Multimedia.........Tl:089.5900.16023 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060123/eac64bed/attachment.bin
