Maciej ?enczykowski wrote: >> as i was one of them who suggest a separate list i remember:-), but i >> don't think anyone has a regex filter on CESA number! so if you'd like >> to keep it my 3th suggestion don't change anything. does anybody has any >> kind of filter which break/should have to change if we use the: >> ------------------------ >> [CentOS-announce] CentOS 3 ia64 kernel - CESA-2006:0140 Important >> security update >> ------------------------ >> style? ok i can write such a filer but any _real_ filter? >> yours. > > > Well actually, seeing as my filters only exclude what they understand > (and figure out to be uninteresting) and let through everything else - > any change in the header would result in them breaking and having to be > fixed-up. can you tell me the real filter? since i do not realy belive it should have to change:-) -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"