recompiling kernel for centos 4.2 x86_64

[jperrin at gmail.com (Jim Perrin)]

> But my changes will be minimal and can be easily documented/explained
> to management.  If it shows up with unsupported in the name, a lot of
> people will be alarmed.  I wish we could call it something else --
> perhaps "plus" or "extended" instead of "unsupported".


What level of support do they think they're getting with CentOS?
Technically it's ALL unsupported. If they want support, have them buy
a rhel license (so that rhel support can laugh at you when you ask for
xfs/reiserfs support).


--
Jim Perrin
System Architect - UIT
Ft Gordon & US Army Signal Center