-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 12:29:48PM -0800, Fong Vang wrote:
> On 1/18/06, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 14:15, Fong Vang wrote:
> >
> > > Which kernel would you recommend? I guess we'll have to try the
> > > kernel from CentOS 4.2.
> >
> > Did you have some reason to not do a full update to 4.2?
>
>
> We have to stick with 4.1 until the next release because our process
> requires it. A release starts with Engineering, then it goes into in
> QA, and eventually hits Production. We can't simply switch to 4.2
> without going through the formal process (which can take a while), but
> I can certainly try out the new kernel on one system and revert
> afterward.
I would recomend against that.
Simply the the non-smp version of the kernel you are already running:
kernel-2.6.9-11.EL.i686.rpm
If you start changing too many things, or making too great a change,
you will never be able to know what fixed the issue, let alone
document it.
- --
Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDzqrwpdyWzQ5b5ckRAufVAJ0b+QuhTg7AfqF9DgQlTCzqtTcsZACeLTwY
iZyRXjBDXh5Actcgld2zaDM=
=wtSB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
