On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 00:35 +0800, James Gallagher wrote: > On 16 Jan 2006, at 8:59 PM, Andrew Rice wrote: > > > hmm I tried that but it didnt seem to want to let me specify the > > interface > > just printed out the options for traceroute... > > Sorry Andrew, my bad. I had a connection via OpenVPN to a remote > server and did the test quickly ... from a Mac. Was lost in other > shell stuff and forgot I wasn't on the same platform as you this > time. Can you do anything with ping -R (I'm sure that's universal) to > record the route and see what happens. Other than that I'm lost on > what you could try. > > Apologies, > James If you have a VPN established and routing setup correctly then a traceoute will show only the main gateway for the VPN and the other endpoint ... then any other routes after that. Like this: [johnny@myth kernel]$ traceroute 192.168.169.40 traceroute to 192.168.169.40 (192.168.169.40), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets 1 192.168.10.3 (192.168.10.3) 0.720 ms 0.424 ms 0.369 ms 2 192.168.168.40 (192.168.169.40) 89.227 ms 87.933 ms 114.058 ms -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060116/5d80dbb2/attachment.bin