LVM

[lesmikesell at gmail.com (Les Mikesell)]

On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 13:40, Johnny Hughes wrote:

> > My recollection is that if any drive in an LVM fails the whole LVM 
> > fails.
> > 
> 
> LVM doesn't fail .. but hard drives do.  If a hard drive failed that was
> part of the LVM, you would lose all that info, true. That is why one
> should use a CRC type RAID (1, 1+0, 5) under LVM ... (or LVM on top of
> RAID) :)
> 
> Then you can replace the failed drive and keep going.

Is there a simple way to install the system on LVM-on-top-of-RAID1?

-- 
  Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx