On 1/9/06, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > But rpm keeps track of everything. There is no equivalent of > 'rpm -e packagename' to remove all parts of a tarball installed > package. Obviously you've never seen "stow". http://www.gnu.org/software/stow/stow.html
Compile vs. RPM
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Compile vs. RPM
- From: barton.schaefer at gmail.com (Bart Schaefer)
- Date: Tue Jan 10 01:17:17 2006
- In-reply-to: <1136828436.18035.55.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <1561724794.20060109001854@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1136809660.6229.17.camel@xxxxxxxxxxx> <43C2585A.1070504@xxxxxxxxxxx> <93937d5a0601090630o3dfc3963s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43C274C9.7060306@xxxxxxxxx> <1136824327.16302.16.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1982992707.20060109091036@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1136828436.18035.55.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Compile vs. RPM
- From: Johnny Hughes
- Compile vs. RPM
- References:
- Compile vs. RPM
- From: Mickael Maddison
- Compile vs. RPM
- From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
- Compile vs. RPM
- From: Peter Farrow
- Compile vs. RPM
- From: Eduardo Grosclaude
- Compile vs. RPM
- From: Karanbir Singh
- Compile vs. RPM
- From: Johnny Hughes
- Compile vs. RPM
- From: Mickael Maddison
- Compile vs. RPM
- From: Les Mikesell
- Compile vs. RPM
- Prev by Date: Compile vs. RPM
- Next by Date: LVM
- Previous by thread: Compile vs. RPM
- Next by thread: Compile vs. RPM
- Index(es):
 |