Todd Reed <treed@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ok...I see some of your points, but if SITE_A talked to
> SITE_B via the internet and they use a 1:1NAT, if the
internet
> goes down at SITE_A, it breaks the 1:1 NAT. Servers down
are
> different than the Internet connection being down.
Didn't I basically put everything short of a big asterisk on
that in the 3-some-odd times I explained it?! ;->
> I never said RRD should be used for failover. I said it
> could be in combination with my idea.
If you have any failover, it's best to update the DNS just in
case it's longer than you expect. ;->
> I guess it would help to know if the web services are
> serving only the company, or are they serving the
> public/Internet?
Exactly! That's why I keep both agreeing _and_ dismissing
many suggestions, because most are only feasible _if_ they
are for a corporate intranet. Most are too arbitrary for the
Internet.
I believe the original poster was talking about the Internet,
but I could be wrong.
--
Bryan J. Smith Professional, Technical Annoyance b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx http://thebs413.blogspot.com
----------------------------------------------------
*** Speed doesn't kill, difference in speed does ***
