Updated DNS Re: Update DNS - Re: DNS maybe problems

[ra+centos at br-online.de (Ralph Angenendt)]

Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 11:27 -0800, Jeff Lasman wrote:
> > 
> > Has to do with the default directory structure for 3.x vs 4.x.
> > 
> > My guess is that 3.x didn't have a chrooted BIND and that 4.x did.
> > 
> > But it's only a guess based on recollection; I'm not looking at a system 
> > now.
> > 
> 
> You can install bind in either a chroot or the regular way on C4.

Same goes for CentOS3.x

Ralph
-- 
Ralph Angenendt......ra@xxxxxxxxxxxx | .."Text processing has made it possible
Bayerischer Rundfunk...HA-Multimedia | ....to right-justify any idea, even one
Rundfunkplatz 1........80300 M?nchen | .which cannot be justified on any other
Tl:089.5900.16023..Fx:089.5900.16240 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060104/e113cb3e/attachment.bin