DNS wizard

[vic at ricker.us (Vic Ricker)]

Maciej ?enczykowski wrote:

>> I tend to agree, although there are places where CNAMEs are necessary 
>> like classless reverse delegation (RFC 2317) or when you don't 
>> control the zone where the target A record(s) live.
>
>
> Classless reverse delegations in now way requires CNAMEs this is 
> really only a BIND-limitation (and not so much a limitation but a 
> combination of administrators laziness and BIND's mindset/zone-file 
> structure).
>
I suppose this is rather off topic but I'm very interested. Could you 
elaborate?

-- 
Vic Ricker
http://www.ricker.us/