Tony Wicks wrote: > If it ran Fedora I would have to always worry about applying updates > as they make break it and seeing as it is 500Km away that would be a > real pain. It always amuses me to see hosting companies offering Fedora as an OS option. Fedora is a testing release, not suitable for hosting real sites. -- Chris Mason -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Centos vs FC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Centos vs FC
- From: lists at masonc.com (Chris Mason (Lists))
- Date: Wed Feb 22 11:49:57 2006
- In-reply-to: <43FC41D1.4080206@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <200602221635.45038.fajarpri@xxxxxxxxxx> <1f8fae340602220205h3831a6bas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43FC41D1.4080206@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- Centos vs FC
- From: Fajar Priyanto
- Centos vs FC
- From: Will McDonald
- Centos vs FC
- From: Tony Wicks
- Centos vs FC
- Prev by Date: Centos vs FC
- Next by Date: Centos vs FC
- Previous by thread: Centos vs FC
- Next by thread: Centos vs FC
- Index(es):
 |