Am Di, den 14.02.2006 schrieb Johnny Hughes um 20:38:
> > The biggest problem I have with SA is that it gets it wrong often enough to be
> > basically worthless. I mean, great - you filter on subject line, looking for
> > "{Spam?}", but then you still have to go thru the junk folder in order to
> > look for false positives, and then you end up reading through all the "P3n1s
> > P|LLS" emails.
> >
> > Gee, didn't we want to avoid this?
>
> That isn't true ... I don't mark the SPAM, i send it to a separate
> folder that the users never see. I delete files older than 2 weeks from
> the folder. If someone complains that an e-mail didn't get to them
> (happens maybe once in a 3 month period) and it's less than 2 weeks old,
> I find it and give it to them.
Here in Germany this kind of setup violates law heavily - called mail
suppression. If you don't like the idea to see a prison from inside you
better not do so in Germany when being a mail provider (or university or
so).
Alexander
--
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp
Serendipity 00:31:48 up 4 days, 9:23, load average: 0.16, 0.14, 0.14
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060215/61864aa8/attachment.bin
