Nmap update checksum failures.

[BillsCentOS at triad.rr.com (William L. Maltby)]

On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 10:55 -0500, Jim Perrin wrote:
> > for the two packages. Since this is quite sometime after the
> > announcement(?), is it reasonable to suspect another problem? Or, again,
> > am I just being too quick on the draw?
> >
> > Feel free to ignore this if so. I'll retry getting that security update
> > another time later in the week.
> 
> Try running 'yum clean all' then 'yum update'  and see what you get.
> rpmforge should include all of dag's packages anyway so there
> shouldn't be a problem. All I can tell you is it "WorksForMe".

All the other's updated fine. I'm going to ribit and do a forced fsck to
make sure I'm not getting victimized by a creeping calamitous failure on
my HD. Then I'll try some manual junk.

Thanks anyway.
Bill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060214/7263e413/attachment.bin