On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 23:04 -0500, Thomas E Dukes wrote:
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> From: centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:centos-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sam Drinkard
> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 10:56 PM
> To: CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: mail access list
>
>
> I just got through updating my /etc/mail/access file, adding
> about 20 more IP's that are sending spam/junk mail. During
> the process, I noticed I had some partial IP's in there, like
> 64.12.233 which is what I wanted to block. The IP did NOT
> however get blocked. From what I see, as long as I have a
> full ip address, they are blocked, but the partial (16) is
> not. Should it not work anyhow? Never had this problem
> before, and yes, I run a make on the file after editing.
>
> Sam
>
> Don't know, but is 64.12.233 a typo? Should it be 64.12.233.
Yes, I was a bit bumble fingered. Actually, that IP was just numbers
pulled out of the air. I've got everything from a /8 to a /24 blocked
and inbetween.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060213/0fc3dd64/attachment.htm
