On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 14:08 +0000, Will McDonald wrote:
> On 08/02/06, Will McDonald <wmcdonald@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'm messing around with NFS v4 (any and all experience/horror stories
> > about EL4's NFS v4 in production environments more than welcome as I'm
> > still at the evaluation/test stage) and looking at the best way to
> > setup the --bind mounts for the NFS v4 pseudofilesystem.
>
> Just found the answer to my own question...
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2003-October/msg00957.html
>
> "mount --bind" is the same as "mount -o bind"
>
> So I can just have bind as an option in haresources for that particular mount.
I was just writing that :)
>
> I'd still be interested in hearing other's opinions on NFS v4 in
> production environments.
>
I have read about, but haven't had any major NFS v4 issues. I don't do
a lot of NFS though ... in fact, the only time I use NFS is if I am
rebuilding a huge number of RPMS and using our round robin build script
so I can get more than 1 server involved in the building.
I did package and build all the DRBD / Heartbeat tools for CentOS and I
have been using these tools in production with zero problems since about
3 months before they were released as extras.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060208/f37e3be8/attachment.bin
