Benjamin Smith wrote: > SELinux is permissive. Additionally, I've run `setenforce 0` > > I'm against a stone wall, here. > > WTF? > > -Ben Ben, The user you're attempting to mount the shares with, has this user account been "enabled" in samba? -- Mark ----------------------------------------------------------- Paid for by Penguins against modern appliances(R) Linux User Since 1996 Powered by RHEL 4
Unable to mount SMB drive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Unable to mount SMB drive
- From: mdw1982 at mdw1982.com (Mark Weaver)
- Date: Tue Feb 7 12:13:21 2006
- In-reply-to: <200602031140.46106.lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <200602021845.33895.lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200602021924.26462.lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <93937d5a0602030802t716407d9o@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200602031140.46106.lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- Unable to mount SMB drive
- From: Benjamin Smith
- Unable to mount SMB drive
- From: Benjamin Smith
- Unable to mount SMB drive
- From: Eduardo Grosclaude
- Unable to mount SMB drive
- From: Benjamin Smith
- Unable to mount SMB drive
- Prev by Date: Booting centos from a windows ris server - SOLVED
- Next by Date: I appear to be attacking others
- Previous by thread: Unable to mount SMB drive
- Next by thread: Unable to mount SMB drive
- Index(es):
 |