On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 06:42 -0500, ryan wrote:
> On Sunday 05 February 2006 10:43 pm, Jim Perrin wrote:
> > > The dramatic differences between the content on those links proves your
> > > point well.
> >
> > I'm certain that the updated font brings the point out more
> > clearly.... and there's a new comma.
> > ...
> > THOSE ARE MAJOR CHANGES!!!!!11111
> >
> > /you win this round... :-P
> >
>
> Hey, if we were Windows guys would be talking about NT 4 (10 yrs old) docs vs
> Win2k (6 yrs old) docs.
>
> :-)
I have to agree with Jim in principal though ... He is pointing to the
documentation for CentOS-4 (for use on CentOS-4) and you are pointing to
the Docs for RH-9.
While in this case the pages are the same, they are quite different in
other areas.
We have full applicable docs here for everything we release :)
http://www.centos.org/docs/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060206/da9f1924/attachment.bin
