Gabriel Gunderson wrote:
> On 1/12/06, Greg Swallow - SkyNet <gregswallow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > If you actually read all the comments you'll find links to here:
> > http://people.redhat.com/stransky/squid/
> > ...and you'll find a release candidate rpm for RHE4U3 (not the
> experimental
> > package, the "Packages planned for next update"), which says it fixes
> that
> > bug. Use that one.
> >
> > Greg
>
> The latest package on that page is squid-2.5.STABLE6-3.4E.11.RC2 when
> CentOS 4 has squid-2.5.STABLE6-3.4E.11. I don't get how that would
> help. This is as of Feb 12th 2006. I still have a flaky squid
> install and I'm pulling my hair out over it.
.RC2 is newer - check the changelog (I understand your confusion - not the
best choice for the name of the rpm, but oh well):
* Mon Oct 17 2005 Martin Stransky <stransky@xxxxxxxxxx>
7:2.5.STABLE6-3.4E.11.RC2
- fix for #160704 - Assertion `(*off) <= sz\' failed.
- fix for #168378 - CVE-2005-2917 Squid malformed NTLM authentication DoS
- fix for #153274 - the 64bit LFS issue
- fix for #161640 - Request to re-enable IDENT lookups in squid
- fix for #162660 - pam authentication fails
- fix for #172697 - Squid doesn't handle headers split across packets
- fix for #170399 - Squid blocks page served by broken server
- fix for #172375 - Error pages should not be replaced by updates
- fix for #172392 - One translated Polish language error is missing
* Tue Sep 6 2005 Martin Stransky <stransky@xxxxxxxxxx> 7:2.5.STABLE6-3.4E.11
...
> My problem sounds more like this:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165367
That bug should be fixed in .RC2 according to the web page and the bug
report - if it's not then provide some feedback on the Redhat bug report -
things only get fixed in Centos if they get fixed in Redhat, so don't be shy
to report/follow up on bugs there.
Greg
