-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 04:47:20PM -0600, Steve Bergman wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 19:06 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > OK I am going to say this once.
>
> I'm not sure what precipitated this statement.
Most likely some issues that ended up on the centos-devel list.
> But as a relatively new
> user of CentOS, I have been impressed with the overall quality of this
> list. The signal to noise ratio is high.
You are obviously VERY new around here :)
> And the responses are helpful.
>
> I'm also subscribed to fedora-list. And believe me... there is no
> comparison. ;-)
Wait and see, wait and see :)
> Any list is going to have people that are more and less respectful of
> the people who do the real work. Don't let it get you down.
I have to agree that we do get lots of good, high quality answers.
But the S/N ratio is far from high, unfortunately. On the other
hand, it has improved lately.
Best Regards,
- --
Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD5Tt7pdyWzQ5b5ckRAuVFAKCYxF5xW3F9IOymVAZTsZeLrSdyfACeKY1H
utmCA4sP9uuTa+I5BjeBEH0=
=ioug
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
