On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 19:09 +0000, U n d e r a c h i e v e r wrote:
> On 28/1/06 16:37, in article
> B9ECBF8D89E7684EB63FF250E8788B1920447B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Drew Weaver"
> <drew.weaver@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> > Bind really couldn't be any easier to use, and it works every
> > time.
>
> Bind zone files are an accident waiting to happen. I don't know anyone who
> uses it who hasn't screwed up the serial number at least once.
>
> djb data files are far simpler, and less likely to go completely horribly
> wrong if you fat finger something.
>
Probably true ... but bind is the DNS standard ... everything is based
on it :)
Using bind (and knowing how to use bind) is the best thing (IMHO) ...
especially if you do this for a living :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060201/f8de0766/attachment.bin
