On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 17:50 -0400, Nat Gross wrote:
> On 4/27/06, William L. Maltby <BillsCentOS@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 16:08 -0400, Nat Gross wrote:
> > > On 4/27/06, Jim Perrin <jperrin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On 4/27/06, Nat Gross <nat101l@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > <snip>
> >
> Whew! By the time I finish the yum docs, a new yum will be here!
Nah! A quick peruse and spot the one that seems to be most *immediately*
and *pervasively* to get the job done. Scan that one and refer to a s
needed. Then make "spare" time and dive into the others. That's what
I've done since I asked my first (two?) yum questions. It helped. I
*hate* bothering others when the answer makes me appear lazy. Other
folks are not so encumbered.
Likewise, when I offer help of *any* kind, I'll try and take the extra
step to help dispel some of the "grumpiness" that comes through in the
most terse replies... uh *most* of the time I'll take the extra step.
Plus, maybe I can impart a little guilt, thereby causing a Q *after*
research rather than before by more folks! =:-O In my dreams, yeah!
There's been a couple new folks showed up and inundated the list for
several days straight, until talk of "spoon feeding" began to surface. I
always hope that my extra info will help folks avoid that.
> tx
> nat
> <snip sig stuff>
--
Bill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060427/071c49ea/attachment.bin
