On 1/29/23 05:49, Philip Wyett wrote:
On Sun, 2023-01-29 at 09:16 +0000, Philip Wyett wrote:
On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 07:45 -0600, Bill Gee wrote:
On 1/26/23 20:25, Philip Wyett wrote:
On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 13:16 -0600, Bill Gee wrote:
I have been running boinc client on CentOS7 hosts for some years. C7 is
getting close to end of life. Time to upgrade to C9 ...
But I cannot find a package for the boinc client. "dnf search boinc"
returns nothing.
I have enabled both EPEL and RPMFusion repositories.
Is there a boinc client package for CentOS9 Stream?
Hi,
The client seems to have been built for EPEL 9 Next, but not as yet for EPEL 9.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/boinc-client
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5978
You can file an issue for the package to be branched and built for EPEL9.
[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/
Regards
Phil
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hmmmm...... I figured out a temporary work-around. I downloaded the
el8 rpm file from EPEL. It installed with no issues on CentOS9.
I looked at turning in a bugzilla report. That requires having an
account at bugzilla. Nope, I do not need to add to the 400+ online
accounts I already have. Besides, there is no guarantee that the
package would be built in any reasonable time frame. It could be
months. I can wait a bit, but not that long.
Is there a way to get dnf to install a "next" package?
It has been a year since CentOS9 came out. The boinc-client package is
not yet ready for it. Is there any assurance that it ever will be
ready? Answer = no assurance whatever.
In the worst case I will go to SOD ... Some Other Distribution. Fedora
38 can be installed in a text-only mode to run headless, and it has a
currently maintained package for boinc-client.
There are both Docker and flatpak packages for boinc-client. I have
never been able to get any Docker, flatpak or snap package to work
correctly, and it is even worse when trying to run them inside a virtual
machine. Those technologies seem to me to be an answer in search of a
non-existent question.
Bill Gee
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
I see what you mean and I made an error here. I should have checked bugzilla for the request to
see
if it already existed, which it does.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092636
I have added a comment to the bug to see if it can be moved forward.
Regards
Phil
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
The ping comment on the bug report has be promptly dealt with by the maintainer and the build for
EPEL9 has now been done and will in 7 days work through testing and then drop into EPEL9 for all to
install.
I hope this is OK for you and dispels the concerns with regards community and how responsive folks
within it are.
Regards
Phil
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Oh, very nice! Thank you Phil. I appreciate random acts of senseless
kindness. :-)
It will be interesting to see how dnf reacts when the el9 package for
boinc goes live. Will dnf recognize it as an upgrade from the el8
package? I will let the group know what happens.
Bill Gee
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
