On 7/20/21 10:03 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
Le 19/07/2021 à 21:38, Johnny Hughes a écrit :
Yes, some items, if you really need 10 years, would require Alma or
Rocky or Oracle if you don't want to pay for RHEL.
Low risk updates over a ten year support cycle are the number one reason we've
all been using "classic" CentOS in the first place.
I have been there for the same reason solely. Switching to "rolling
release" style distribution (Like Debian and clones, or FreeBSD - the
last is no Linux ;-) will occasionally require a but of work when some
component steps up and does need a bit of config adjustment, but it pays
off by smooth in-place upgrade (which I just did on one box from Debian
9 "stretch" to Debian 10 "buster", and was doing FreeBSD upgrades same
smoothly through multiple releases during last decade...)
Just my 2 cents.
Valeri
--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Valeri Galtsev
Sr System Administrator
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Phone: 773-702-4247
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos