On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 at 08:24, Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 13.04.21 12:33, Simon Matter wrote:
> >>> Once upon a time, Nicolas Kovacs <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> >>>> Both PVE and PBS are based on Debian, and now I wonder if RHEL-based
> >>>> systems
> >>>> have something similar to offer.
> >>>
> >>> I believe Red Hat Virtualization, and its open upstream oVirt, are
> >>> comparable to Proxmox. I have used oVirt for a number of years. oVirt
> >>> itself doesn't include backup software (it supports VM snapshots and
> >>> clones), but there are several third-party backup tools (both free and
> >>> commercial) compatible with oVirt/RHV, like Storeware's vProtect (I
> >>> haven't used it but seen others mention it).
> >>
> >> I haven't followed oVirt/RHV but I'm wondering how free it is? Is it as
> >> "free" as RHEL or as CentOS/Alma/Rocky/Navy/Oracle Linux?
> >
> > Upstream -> Product
> >
> > Fedora -> RHEL
> > oVirt -> RHV
>
> Thanks for the confirmation.
>
> In other words, we'll soon have four or more almost 100% identical
> rebuilds of RHEL but only 1 very lacking EPEL and 0 RHV clones ;-)
>
>
Those all depend on committed volunteers to do the work. That takes up a
lot of time and effort from people who are in short supply because doing
those things are more like a job than a 'weekend fun project'. This would
normally be where people would pay for a product but there are not a lot of
paying customers and a larger number of people who either expect it there
or would rather go without than pay for it.
> Regards,
> Simon
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
