> All relevant logging is centralised to a server cluster running Graylog. ... and, because I forgot to mention it: Yes, that server cluster has a "persistent data" device. Regards, Peter. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: KVM vs. incremental remote backups
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: KVM vs. incremental remote backups
- From: Peter Eckel via CentOS <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:34:38 +0200
- In-reply-to: <AD66D485-7AE2-4EB8-85D1-37A710C22F38@eckel-edv.de>
- References: <b8efacca-05b1-22b5-c8db-4a81909aef3f@microlinux.fr> <79DDC7F1-636D-4A81-9540-AD3309720EBD@eckel-edv.de> <bc613bbdbc226dd997bff83df891a705.squirrel@xxl.corp.invoca.ch> <AD66D485-7AE2-4EB8-85D1-37A710C22F38@eckel-edv.de>
- References:
- KVM vs. incremental remote backups
- From: Nicolas Kovacs
- Re: KVM vs. incremental remote backups
- From: Peter Eckel via CentOS
- Re: KVM vs. incremental remote backups
- From: Simon Matter
- Re: KVM vs. incremental remote backups
- From: Peter Eckel via CentOS
- KVM vs. incremental remote backups
- Prev by Date: Re: KVM vs. incremental remote backups
- Next by Date: Re: Can't upgrade sssd-*
- Previous by thread: Re: KVM vs. incremental remote backups
- Next by thread: Migrating to nvme and expand
- Index(es):
 |