Re: KVM vs. incremental remote backups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Le 31/03/2021 à 21:35, Gionatan Danti a écrit :
> 
> Finally, I would leave the current rsnapshot backups in-place: you will simply
> copy from a virtual machine rather than from a bare metal host. I found
> rsnapshot really useful and reliable, so I suggest to continue using it even if
> efficient block-level backup are taken.

First of all, thanks to everybody for your competent input.

Indeed, there's (almost) nothing wrong with Rsnapshot. It even saved me on
March 7th when my main production server crashed.

The problem with using Rsnapshot on the VM's filesystems rather than backing up
the whole VM is the time it takes to restore all the mess.

Niki

-- 
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr
Mail : info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
Mob. : 06 51 80 12 12
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux