XFS is suitable for parallel workload, so I would pick ext4 for this case.
Here is a quote from https://access.redhat.com/articles/3129891 :
Another way to characterize this is that the Ext4 file system variants tend to perform better on systems that have limited I/O capability. Ext3 and Ext4 perform better on limited bandwidth (< 200MB/s) and up to ~1,000 IOPS capability. For anything with higher capability, XFS tends to be faster.
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 2:42, Kenneth Porter<shiva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: I'm setting up a CentOS 7 box as a BackupPC 4 server to back up Windows
boxes on my LAN. I'm using an external 1.5 TB USB drive for the "pool".
BackupPC deduplicates by saving all files in a pool, a directory hiearchy
with each file named for the checksum of the file, and the directories
acting as a hash tree to reach each pool file. A backup for a specific
workstation is a directory tree of checksums and metadata that point into
the pool for the actual file data. Incremental backups are reverse deltas
from periodic "filled" backups of all files. I'm using rsyncd to pull
changed files from the workstations.
I'm deciding which filesystem to use for my external drive. I'm thinking
the main candidates are ext4 and xfs. What's the best filesystem for this
application?
<https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc>
Repo for CentOS 7 users:
<https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/BackupPC/>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
