On 1/21/21 2:28 PM, Jamie Burchell wrote: > The RHEL announcement is of no use to me or my company. We spin up DigitalOcean droplets for each of our client websites/apps. If we were utilising horizontal scaling we'd have even more droplets per website/app. We'd easily have over 16 installations. > Red Hat is working also with Hosting Providers to come up with plans. If I were you, I would talk to the list at centos-questiions@xxxxxxxxxx I have no idea what the planned options are (I work on CentOS Linux 7 and 8 and CentOS Stream .. so I don't interact with that group. This initiative is one of their plans. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: RHEL changes
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: RHEL changes
- From: Johnny Hughes <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:11:28 -0600
- In-reply-to: <3FB0FD93-DE86-4D5B-9C2B-2B012E110B90@jamieburchell.com>
- Organization: The CentOS Project
- References: <03f101d6f02f$a0534830$e0f9d890$@com> <3FB0FD93-DE86-4D5B-9C2B-2B012E110B90@jamieburchell.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1
- References:
- Re: RHEL changes
- From: Scott Techlist
- Re: RHEL changes
- From: Jamie Burchell
- Re: RHEL changes
- Prev by Date: Re: RHEL changes
- Next by Date: Re: CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver
- Previous by thread: Re: RHEL changes
- Next by thread: Compiling Qt applications in docker
- Index(es):
 |