On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 20:51:09 +0000 Jamie Burchell wrote: > So RH could make it difficult for downstream projects such a Rocky Linux. I don't imagine Redhat will go out of their way to make it easy for Rocky Linux. But there's a point beyond which they can't go without contravening the GPL (and other licenses) so they couldn't do that legally, and there's also a point beyond which they'll alienate more of their customers. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: RHEL changes
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: RHEL changes
- From: Frank Cox <theatre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 15:08:55 -0600
- Feedback-id: theatre@sasktel
- In-reply-to: <F781E637-539B-4AF7-93E7-8DDA5A969AC1@jamieburchell.com>
- References: <bc326f9b-b05d-1b9c-fe3c-36e688835317@kicp.uchicago.edu> <F781E637-539B-4AF7-93E7-8DDA5A969AC1@jamieburchell.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RHEL changes
- From: Phil Perry
- Re: RHEL changes
- References:
- Re: RHEL changes
- From: Valeri Galtsev
- Re: RHEL changes
- From: Jamie Burchell
- Re: RHEL changes
- Prev by Date: Re: RHEL changes
- Next by Date: Re: RHEL changes
- Previous by thread: Re: RHEL changes
- Next by thread: Re: RHEL changes
- Index(es):
 |