Good. At least I can consider moving to that without fear of RH pulling the plug!
> On 22 Jan 2021, at 20:39, Marc Balmer via CentOS <centos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Am 22.01.2021 um 21:36 schrieb Jamie Burchell <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>> Can RH put a stop to projects like Rocky Linux?
>
> No.
>
>>
>>>>> On 22 Jan 2021, at 18:04, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 07:25:04AM -0500, Konstantin Boyandin via CentOS wrote:
>>>>> I wonder whether RH plan to fight back FUD they've brought upon by their
>>>>> December announcement.
>>>
>>> I mean.... really the only thing we can do is live up to the given plan with
>>> Stream and RHEL options, which as far as I can see is exactly what's
>>> happening.
>>>
>>>> Personally, I found this "no-cost" promise lacking substantial details.
>>>
>>> This is just the announcement of it, of course. The full details will be
>>> there when the whole thing is launched, which the announcement says will be
>>> very soon.
>>>
>>>
>>>> If RH doesn't verify everyone requesting developer subscription (forcing
>>>> to prove identity), the 16 installations limit is easily circumvented by
>>>> multiple registrations.
>>>
>>> There are always going to be cheaters. Don't be one of them.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthew Miller
>>> <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Fedora Project Leader
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CentOS mailing list
>>> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
