Re: RHEL changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]




> Am 22.01.2021 um 08:40 schrieb Ljubomir Ljubojevic <centos@xxxxxxxx>:
> 
> On 1/21/21 11:40 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:36:44PM +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>> On 1/21/21 8:53 PM, Alfredo Perez wrote:
>>>> Is this good news for the "Centos" family?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> There is no CentOS "family". CentOS clone is dead and will be now
>> 
>> Odd that you say it's dead when 7 doesn't sunset until June 30th, 2024.
>> 
> 
> Maybe not best choice of the word, but I meant there will not be further
> development on that front. CentOS 7 cloning will be just rinse and
> repeat of established process. If CentOS 8 was not killed almost no one
> would have installed CentOS 7 on any new server (keeping in mind desire
> for 10-year til EOL), so I see CentOS 7 as close to EOL and his
> usefulness for new systems will only decrease.

I couldn't agree more.

> 
> Hence it is as good as dead in my mind when looking into the future, I
> am looking for future distro of choice.

A little mentioned choice would be openSUSE, which is direction I am taking.

> 
> 
> -- 
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic
> (Love is in the Air)
> PL Computers
> Serbia, Europe
> 
> StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux