Re: CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 1/5/21 11:31 PM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
No, this was an actual problem I had back in April 2020. Upgrading from CR
broke imagemagick


At the time, you described that problem as:

I got an alert from Yum-Cron this morning:
Failed to check for updates with the following error message:
Failed to build transaction: sclo-php72-php-pecl-imagick-3.4.4-1.el7.x86_64
requires libMagickCore.so.5()(64bit)


I don't have enough information to say why imagemagick or php would be broken, as you said it was.

What I do see is that the sclo-php72-php-pecl-imagick has a dependency on libMagickCore.so.5()(64bit), which is recorded in the rpm package.  If you have a package from a third party repository (either EPEL or SCLO, or others), and it depends on one of the few packages in CentOS Stream (or CentOS, or RHEL) that aren't guaranteed to be stable, and which Red Hat changes, then yum will warn you that the update would result in unresolvable dependencies, and it won't upgrade the package.  Your system will keep the old imagemagick package and the old php-imagick package until the dependencies are resolved in the two repositories, and it'll update them after that.

Stream doesn't change that.


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux